There were many fantastic readings
and videos this week that focused on details like the Constructivism Theory,
Connectivism Theory, Cyborg Learning Theory, and Social Networking Technologies
in Education. All of these articles
zoned in on the idea that students are more actively involved in a
constructivist classroom than a traditional classroom. “They more often share ideas, ask questions,
and feel the freedom to revise their ideas and collaborate with classmates (Sprague,
1999). Vygotsky’s Theory of Coonstructivism
fixated on the idea that you never learn anything from scratch. You are constantly constructing new ideas
along the course of your life.
Successful learners start off with a pool of ideas and then embed new
ideas into the old ones. This type of
thinking allows for learning to become both an active and reflective
process. It’s a great way to build new
knowledge.
The Connectivism Theory taught us
that the network that learners created becomes the learning itself. I have experienced this through my course
work here at Lamar. I have learned a
great deal from connecting with my classmates, and collaborating on various
projects with them.
There are so many new technologies
that are going to shape the environments of our classrooms, and the way that
student’s learn. The Cyborg Theory
centers on the idea that you can implant a chip into your nervous system and
enhance your brainpower. This sounded
crazy to me at first. But, is this the
way that society is headed? Many new
technologies are interactive, therefore making it easier to create environments
in which students can learn by doing, receiving feedback, and reflecting. “Social networking and virtual environments
unleash creativity that could not occur otherwise (McPeethers, 2009). Who knows…maybe one day cyborgs will be a
thing of the past.
Abbott, J. (nd). Building
Knowledge: Constructivism in Learning. [Video file].
Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F00R3pOXz
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How
people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded edition). Ch.
9, pp. 194-218. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9853&page=206
McPheeters, D. (2009, March). Social networking technologies in
education. Tech and Learning, 29(8).Retrieved from http://www.techlearning.com/article/16250
Pitler, H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using
technology with classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA:
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Siemens, G. (nd). The Changing Nature of
Knowledge [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMcTHndpzYg
Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, (1999). Learning
as a personal event: A brief introduction to constructivism. Retrieved from
http://www.sedl.org/pubs/tec26/intro2c.html
Sprague, D. & Dede, C. (1999). If I teach this way, Am I
doing my job: Constructivism in the classroom. Leading and Learning,
27(1). Retrieved from the International Society for Technology in Education at
http://imet.csus.edu/imet9/280/docs/dede_constructivisim.pdf
Warwirk, K. (nd). Cyborg
Life [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB_l7SY_ngI
No comments:
Post a Comment